<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Running With Elevated Privileges</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dannyjessee.com/blog/index.php/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dannyjessee.com/blog</link>
	<description>Thoughts and observations from a SharePoint developer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 13:02:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Using LinkedIn as an Identity Provider for SharePoint 2010 by Running With Elevated Privileges » Blog Archive » Using LinkedIn as an Identity Provider for SharePoint 2010 &#171; JC&#8217;s Blog-O-Gibberish</title>
		<link>http://www.dannyjessee.com/blog/index.php/2012/02/using-linkedin-as-an-identity-provider-for-sharepoint-2010/#comment-314</link>
		<dc:creator>Running With Elevated Privileges » Blog Archive » Using LinkedIn as an Identity Provider for SharePoint 2010 &#171; JC&#8217;s Blog-O-Gibberish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 13:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dannyjessee.com/blog/?p=181#comment-314</guid>
		<description>[...] Running With Elevated Privileges » Blog Archive » Using LinkedIn as an Identity Provider for SharePoint&#160;2010  Posted on February 21, 2012 by johnacook   http://www.dannyjessee.com/blog/index.php/2012/02/using-linkedin-as-an-identi&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Running With Elevated Privileges » Blog Archive » Using LinkedIn as an Identity Provider for SharePoint&nbsp;2010  Posted on February 21, 2012 by johnacook   <a href="http://www.dannyjessee.com/blog/index.php/2012/02/using-linkedin-as-an-identi&#038;#8230" rel="nofollow">http://www.dannyjessee.com/blog/index.php/2012/02/using-linkedin-as-an-identi&#038;#8230</a>; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Using LinkedIn as an Identity Provider for SharePoint 2010 by Liam Cleary</title>
		<link>http://www.dannyjessee.com/blog/index.php/2012/02/using-linkedin-as-an-identity-provider-for-sharepoint-2010/#comment-313</link>
		<dc:creator>Liam Cleary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 21:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dannyjessee.com/blog/?p=181#comment-313</guid>
		<description>Very cool indeed, saved me time of having to figure it out :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very cool indeed, saved me time of having to figure it out <img src='http://www.dannyjessee.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Required Trust Relationships for the Facebook C# SDK in SharePoint 2010 by Beyond Authentication: Deeper Facebook Integration with SharePoint (with code!) &#171; Running With Elevated Privileges</title>
		<link>http://www.dannyjessee.com/blog/index.php/2011/12/required-trust-relationships-for-the-facebook-c-sdk-in-sharepoint-2010/#comment-255</link>
		<dc:creator>Beyond Authentication: Deeper Facebook Integration with SharePoint (with code!) &#171; Running With Elevated Privileges</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 21:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dannyjessee.com/blog/index.php/2011/12/required-trust-relationships-for-the-facebook-c-sdk-in-sharepoint-2010/#comment-255</guid>
		<description>[...] to be able to see the source code. (Having access to the source code helped me troubleshoot this issue as well.) The SDK includes support for .NET Framework 3.5/4.0 and Silverlight. Obviously, we must [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to be able to see the source code. (Having access to the source code helped me troubleshoot this issue as well.) The SDK includes support for .NET Framework 3.5/4.0 and Silverlight. Obviously, we must [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Required Trust Relationships for the Facebook C# SDK in SharePoint 2010 by Danny Jessee</title>
		<link>http://www.dannyjessee.com/blog/index.php/2011/12/required-trust-relationships-for-the-facebook-c-sdk-in-sharepoint-2010/#comment-244</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Jessee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 10:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dannyjessee.com/blog/index.php/2011/12/required-trust-relationships-for-the-facebook-c-sdk-in-sharepoint-2010/#comment-244</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Nathan! Look forward to seeing you Saturday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Nathan! Look forward to seeing you Saturday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Required Trust Relationships for the Facebook C# SDK in SharePoint 2010 by Nathan DeWitt</title>
		<link>http://www.dannyjessee.com/blog/index.php/2011/12/required-trust-relationships-for-the-facebook-c-sdk-in-sharepoint-2010/#comment-241</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan DeWitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 06:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dannyjessee.com/blog/index.php/2011/12/required-trust-relationships-for-the-facebook-c-sdk-in-sharepoint-2010/#comment-241</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m so glad you put this up.  I was on the fence about what sessions to attend, but this post really sealed the deal for me.  A demo that is not just a cursory walk-through of this kind of stuff but includes actual &quot;gotchas&quot; from working through these issues is exactly the type of content I&#039;m looking for.

See you in VA Beach!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m so glad you put this up.  I was on the fence about what sessions to attend, but this post really sealed the deal for me.  A demo that is not just a cursory walk-through of this kind of stuff but includes actual &#8220;gotchas&#8221; from working through these issues is exactly the type of content I&#8217;m looking for.</p>
<p>See you in VA Beach!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Required Trust Relationships for the Facebook C# SDK in SharePoint 2010 by Danny Jessee</title>
		<link>http://www.dannyjessee.com/blog/index.php/2011/12/required-trust-relationships-for-the-facebook-c-sdk-in-sharepoint-2010/#comment-172</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Jessee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2011 11:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dannyjessee.com/blog/index.php/2011/12/required-trust-relationships-for-the-facebook-c-sdk-in-sharepoint-2010/#comment-172</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure if the sessions at SPSVB will be recorded or not. At a minimum, I will be posting my slide deck and all my code afterwards. Thanks for your interest!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure if the sessions at SPSVB will be recorded or not. At a minimum, I will be posting my slide deck and all my code afterwards. Thanks for your interest!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Required Trust Relationships for the Facebook C# SDK in SharePoint 2010 by Chris Howell</title>
		<link>http://www.dannyjessee.com/blog/index.php/2011/12/required-trust-relationships-for-the-facebook-c-sdk-in-sharepoint-2010/#comment-170</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Howell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2011 04:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dannyjessee.com/blog/index.php/2011/12/required-trust-relationships-for-the-facebook-c-sdk-in-sharepoint-2010/#comment-170</guid>
		<description>I won&#039;t be able to make it to SharePoint Saturday Virginia Beach but would be very interested in seeing outcome of your demo. Will you record the session and put up afterwards?

Cheers,
Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I won&#8217;t be able to make it to SharePoint Saturday Virginia Beach but would be very interested in seeing outcome of your demo. Will you record the session and put up afterwards?</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ensure an SPUser Exists in an Application Page Within an Anonymously Accessible Site by Danny Jessee</title>
		<link>http://www.dannyjessee.com/blog/index.php/2011/11/ensure-an-spuser-exists-in-an-application-page-within-an-anonymously-accessible-site/#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Jessee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 17:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dannyjessee.com/blog/index.php/2011/11/ensure-an-spuser-exists-in-an-application-page-within-an-anonymously-accessible-site/#comment-142</guid>
		<description>Paul – you are absolutely right. I have updated the code to reflect this good practice. Thank you for pointing that out, and thanks for reading!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul – you are absolutely right. I have updated the code to reflect this good practice. Thank you for pointing that out, and thanks for reading!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ensure an SPUser Exists in an Application Page Within an Anonymously Accessible Site by Paul Schaeflein</title>
		<link>http://www.dannyjessee.com/blog/index.php/2011/11/ensure-an-spuser-exists-in-an-application-page-within-an-anonymously-accessible-site/#comment-140</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Schaeflein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 16:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dannyjessee.com/blog/index.php/2011/11/ensure-an-spuser-exists-in-an-application-page-within-an-anonymously-accessible-site/#comment-140</guid>
		<description>You should *not* reference SPContext inside you RWEP delegate. Grab the SPSite.ID and SPWeb.ID before and use those to create your new context.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should *not* reference SPContext inside you RWEP delegate. Grab the SPSite.ID and SPWeb.ID before and use those to create your new context.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SPSTCDC 2011 Recap by Jim Bob Howard</title>
		<link>http://www.dannyjessee.com/blog/index.php/2011/08/spstcdc-2011-recap/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Bob Howard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Aug 2011 22:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dannyjessee.com/blog/?p=100#comment-58</guid>
		<description>Great summary! And I heartily agree. Very well run and executed conference at an unbeatable price. What makes SharePoint Saturday so great is its volunteers: it takes organizers, speakers, and a hundred other roles and tasks to bring it to the community. And the Conference version was no different! Well done, friends!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great summary! And I heartily agree. Very well run and executed conference at an unbeatable price. What makes SharePoint Saturday so great is its volunteers: it takes organizers, speakers, and a hundred other roles and tasks to bring it to the community. And the Conference version was no different! Well done, friends!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

